Recently, Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) chairman Bashir Dalhatu made headlines when he suggested that the Nigerian government could consider dialogue, rehabilitation, and reintegration for bandits in northern Nigeria — drawing comparisons to programs used for Niger Delta militants.
Media and social media posts quickly interpreted his statement as a call for full amnesty and payments to armed groups, sparking debates nationwide.
Dalhatu emphasized the importance of a rehabilitative approach for some offenders, especially impoverished youths involved in banditry.
He called on the government to “extend a hand of friendship” while maintaining that criminal acts must be punished.
He drew a reference to the Niger Delta militants’ reintegration program as an example of addressing grievances through rehabilitation.
⚠️The Arewa Consultative Forum later clarified that they did not endorse unconditional amnesty or payments for bandits or terrorists.
According to the ACF, clips circulating online were truncated or taken out of context, giving a misleading impression of Dalhatu’s message.
The forum reaffirmed that any rehabilitation program must be coupled with firm consequences for wrongdoing.
How public statements can be misrepresented online
The sensitivity of security and insurgency discourse in Nigeria
The need for balanced reporting and verifying claims before spreading them on social media
While Dalhatu suggested a rehabilitative approach for bandits, the claim that the ACF advocated giving “money like Niger Delta militants” is misleading. The forum emphasizes the importance of accountability alongside any reintegration efforts.
Comments